TEMA Foundation Board Chairman Deniz Ataç, drew attention to the fact that the proposal poses major risks not only in environmental terms but also in social and legal terms, and said:
“The Mining Law has been amended 4 times since it entered into force on June 1985, 30. Most of these amendments facilitated mining activities while weakening nature protection measures. Articles added in 2004 have largely liberalized mining. For example, with the amendment made to Article 7, many areas such as forests, national parks, and special environmental protection areas have become open to mining. The Mining Law has been positioned as a law above other environmental and nature protection laws. In addition to the amendments to the law, the Prime Ministry Circular No. 2009/7 has further paved the way for mining activities by weakening the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) processes. Each new regulation has increased the risk of destruction on nature and life. However, I regret to say that no amendment made to date has ever created such great pressure on natural and cultural assets. This proposal is based on a perspective that sees nature protection as an obstacle. This approach, which defines public interest in favor of companies, is completely far from protecting our natural assets, which are the source of life.”
Can 93% of its surface area be a city with a mining license?
Within the scope of the license map studies carried out by TEMA Foundation since 2019, the density of Group IV (gold, silver, coal, copper, nickel, etc.) mining licenses in 29 provinces was examined. This study revealed that an average of 67% of the surface area of the provinces in question is licensed for these mines. 93% of Gümüşhane and 92% of Kütahya are covered by Group IV mining licenses.
Deniz Ataç, drawing attention to this situation, said, “In our study, we only looked at Group IV mining activities. Sand, marble, and stone quarries are not included in these rates. Only metallic mines, coal mines, and industrial raw materials are included in this group. In these licensed areas, nature is irreversibly damaged from the production process to the closure process. Even after the mine is closed and the company leaves the area, the heap leach, waste areas, and waste dams left on the site mean that the danger will continue for decades. For this reason, we repeat what our Founding Honorary President and Earth Grandfather, the late Hayrettin Karaca, said: 'If you want to live, you have to make others live.' For the integrity of the ecosystem and the continuity of life, our natural and cultural areas must be closed to mining activities by law. Because we know that if the law does not protect, the mine does not make others live.
“This Proposal Does Not Protect Nature, It Ignores It”
The bill that came to the General Assembly directly affects many regulations such as the Environmental Law, Pasture Law, Electricity Market Law and Renewable Energy Law, as well as the Mining Law. The amendments presented on the grounds of “economic stability” and “national interest” increase the pressure on our natural assets.
Stating that the bill weakens the principle of public interest and sees nature protection approaches as “obstacles” and suggests that “these obstacles” be removed, Ataç said, “This proposal does not protect nature, it ignores it. With the regulations presented, license and permit processes are accelerated in favor of investors. The period for public institutions to submit their opinions in EIA processes is limited to 3 months; opinions that are not responded to within the period are automatically considered positive. The management of all permit and license processes is gathered in a single institution, the General Directorate of Mining and Petroleum Affairs (MAPEG). The way is opened for mining activities in protected areas. EIA processes are rendered ineffective. While we demand a law that prioritizes and protects soil, water, forests and pastures, the proposal we discussed today, which passed the commission on Friday, has caused deep sadness. If this proposal becomes law, protected areas will remain as “protected” only in name. As the TEMA Foundation, we have conveyed our opinions many times. We advocate that a legal framework that protects our soil, water, forests, pastures and olives; all our natural and cultural assets should be established. We are "While we continue our work in this direction, unfortunately it is not possible to find any trace of this approach in the draft law," he said.
The Danger to Water and Food Security is Huge, We Must Defend Life!
The discussions in the TBMM Commission, which convened with such a critical agenda, continued for 25,5 hours without interruption and unfortunately the proposal was accepted in the commission. This proposal will be discussed in the General Assembly of the Parliament.
If this proposal becomes law, mining pressure on our natural and cultural assets will increase, citizens' rights of ownership and participation will be limited, and urgent expropriation practices will become widespread.
Deniz Ataç, who stated that these regulations pose a danger not only to nature but also to many areas, said, “We must defend life. The enactment of this proposal also poses serious threats to farmers engaged in subsistence farming, rural life, food and water security. The provisions in the proposed law not only undermine the integrity of the ecosystem but also endanger the right of society to live in a healthy and safe environment. As the TEMA Foundation, we call once again; this proposal, which is clearly contrary to the Constitution and the international agreements we are a party to, must be rejected; our natural assets and the right to life of future generations must be protected.”
Source: HORECA TREND and THEME Foundation